BOOK
REVIEWS
George
Justice, Editor
Theatre Redux
Jane Austen and the Theatre
By Paula Byrne.
Hambledon and London, 2002. xvi + 238
pages.
47 B/W illustrations. Hardcover. $35.
Reviewed by Nora Nachumi.
2002 was a watershed year for those
interested in Jane Austen’s relationship to the theatre. Like Penny
Gay’s identically titled study (reviewed in the April 2003 issue of JASNA News), Paula Byrne’s Jane Austen and the Theatre
demonstrates that Austen’s interest in the theatre played a formative
role in the development of her comic art. Byrne’s study, however, is
different from Gay’s. Byrne covers less ground than Gay but she delves
more deeply into her subject. The result is a gratifyingly thorough
examination of Austen’s involvement with the 18th Century stage.
Byrne’s book is divided into two sections: “The Novelist and the
Theatre” and “The Theatre and the Novels.” In Part 1, Byrne, like Gay,
not only discusses the private theatricals that took place at Steventon
rectory between 1782 and 1789, but also considers the behavior of
Austen’s cousin, Eliza de Feuillide, whose participation in the Austen
family theatricals may have provided the inspiration for the flirtation
between Henry Crawford and Maria Bertram in Mansfield Park. Byrne, however,
spends more time on the plays themselves, noting how they illuminate
the Austen family’s ease with risqué language, racy topics, and
subjects like female independence. Byrne also examines the prologues
written by Austen’s brother James, noting that both he and his brother
Henry played a pivotal role in the formation of their sister’s literary
imagination. Indeed, in Part 2, Byrne links Austen’s reliance of the
burlesque mode of comedy in the Juvenilia to her brothers’ literary
journal, The Loiterer, which
ran for 60 numbers between 1789 and 1790. Just as important, she
contends, were Henry Fielding’s burlesque comedy, Tom Thumb, and Richard Brinsley
Sheridan’s satirical comedies: The
Critic, The Rivals, and The School for Scandal; all three,
she demonstrates, are present in “Love and Freindship.”
Byrne also discusses the three short theatrical pieces in the
Juvenilia. In part 1 she argues that “The Visit” is an intentional
parody of the moral dramas and dialogues contained in Arnaud Berquin’s
“L’ami des enfants” and “L’ami de l’adolescence.” Like Gay, she
contends that “The Mystery” and “The First Act of a Comedy” were
inspired not only by the private theatricals at Steventon, but by what
was popular on the London Stage. She supports this claim by
establishing Austen’s familiarity with the professional theatre in
Chapters 2 and 3. Austen, Byrne contends, “was utterly familiar with
contemporary actors and the range and repertoire of the theatres” in
Bath, Southampton, and London and a discerning critic of plays and
performances. Byrne does her subject justice in this area by providing
information on the various styles of acting embodied by stars like John
Phillip Kemble, Sarah Siddons, Eliza O’Neill, and Edmund Kean—the last
three of whom Austen comments upon in her letters.
In Part 2, Byrne’s consideration of Austen’s fiction differs from Gay’s
in several respects. Unlike Gay, she declines to discuss Northanger Abbey or Persuasion: the former because it
is primarily concerned with the gothic novel, and the latter because
she finds Austen’s late works less obviously theatrical than the
earlier novels. Conversely, she includes discussions of Austen’s
burlesque play, Sir Charles
Grandison; or, The Happy Man and her epistolary novel, Lady Susan. Using these texts Byrne
traces Austen’s “experimentation with, and eventual rejection of,
dramatic and epistolary forms,” in favor of third-person narration. In
Chapter 6, she expands on the similarity between Sense and Sensibility and The Rivals. In Chapter 7, she
examines Pride and Prejudice
in light of structural developments in sentimental comedy since
Shakespeare’s time.
Mansfield Park is inevitably
the most obvious example of the influence of the theatre upon Austen’s
fiction given her use of Lovers’ Vows.
It is also the most fraught, following as it does upon the decades-old
debate about Austen’s view of the play and of play going in general.
Byrne devotes an entire chapter to the play, contending that, like the
novel, it explores “the difficulties of a prohibited relationship, from
a woman’s perspective.” Ultimately, she contends that Austen uses the
play to reveal what is wrong with Sir Thomas Bertram and the system of
marriage that he endorses. The following chapter examines Mansfield Park in light of The Clandestine Marriage and The Heir at Law, and underscores
the novel’s will to collapse the distinction between on stage and off.
In the final chapter on Emma,
which is much shorter than the others, the distinction is between
outward appearance and internal experience. Rather than link the novel
to a specific play, the chapter points out that many 18th Century plays
were implicitly concerned with this topic. In Emma all the world is a stage,
Byrne contends, and the social self is always performed. Paula
Byrne’s study is a persuasive argument for the importance of the
theatre in Austen’s work. After reading it, one is left with a far
better understanding of the complex interplay between Austen’s novels
and the 18th Century stage.
Nora Nachumi is an assistant professor in the Department of English at
Stern College for Women/Yeshiva University in New York. She is writing
about Austen criticism, popular culture, and the Internet.
JASNA News
v.20, no. 2, Summer 2004, p. 19
See more book reviews
Return to Home Page